Do you have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a brothel or illegal massage parlor?

Yesterday Justice Nancy Mills dismissed 46 of 59 counts in the Mark Strong trial. The counts dismissed were all misdemeanor violation of privacy counts. In the Strong case “Mark Strong is guilty of violation of privacy if, except in the execution of a public duty or as authorized by law, Mark Strong intentionally installs or uses in a private place without the consent of the person or persons entitled to privacy in that place, any device for observing, photographing, recording, amplifying or broadcasting sounds or events in that place. As used in this section, ‘private place’ means a place where one may reasonably expect to be safe from surveillance, including, but not limited to, changing or dressing rooms, bathrooms and similar places.” I have not been privy to Justice Mills’ order but I suspect she ruled the a person visiting an illegal brothel or illegal massage parlor does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy.


The prosecution is unhappy with this order. They requested and received permission from the State’s Attorney General, as is required by law, to file an interlocutory appeal. This brings Mark Strong’s trial to an immediate stop until the appeal can be decided.


What are your thoughts – Should a person visiting an illegal brothel or illegal massage parlor have an expectation that their illegal activities would not be recorded?



David Sharp, Associated Press


Maine | Friday, January 25, 2013 at 11:30 am

ALFRED — A judge on Friday dropped most of the charges against a figure in a prostitution scandal centered on a Zumba studio, prompting another appeal, more jury selection delays and defense accusations of prosecution “shenanigans.”

Justice Nancy Mills dismissed 46 of 59 misdemeanor counts against Mark Strong Sr., a day after the state’s highest court ruled the closed jury selection process had to be opened to the public.

Prosecutors appealed the dismissal, bringing the proceeding to an abrupt halt. Remaining members of the jury pool were sent home Friday, just as they had been the day before.

Strong had pleaded not guilty to all the counts, including conspiring with dance instructor Alexis Wright, who stands accused of using her Kennebunk studio as a prostitution front.

Prosecutors say prostitution clients were videotaped without their knowledge, and all the dismissed charges relate to invasion of privacy.

Strong’s attorneys had argued that people engaged in committing a crime — in this case paying for sex — have no right to privacy under a state law aimed at protecting innocent people in dressing rooms and locker rooms. Mills agreed to dismiss the counts, leaving 13 counts related to promotion of prostitution.

Lawyers for the state said they would appeal the mass dismissal to the state supreme court. That drew the ire of Strong’s attorneys, who have pressed for a speedy trial.

Tina Nadeau, one of Strong’s lawyers, said the appeal will result in a delay that would be prejudicial to Strong. Potential jurors spent much of Friday waiting for a fourth day in the courtroom basement and she said they might blame the defendant for delays.

“There’s no doubt they could take it out on him,” she told the judge. “Every minute that we’re sitting here, his rights are being violated.”

Dan Lilley, Strong’s other lawyer, said there was little chance that the supreme court would reinstate the dismissed charges, and he asked that trial on the remaining counts proceed.

He accused prosecutors of “shenanigans” and didn’t hold back on his opinion of the appeal: “We think it’s frivolous.”

Strong, who’s married, has acknowledged having a physical relationship with Wright after helping her launch her Pure Vida fitness studio by co-signing for her lease and loaning money that was repaid with interest. He said he was unaware of any prostitution and did nothing wrong.

Police said Wright videotaped many of the encounters without clients’ knowledge and kept records suggesting the sex acts generated $150,000 over 18 months.

Wright, who also has pleaded not guilty, faces 106 counts including prostitution and invasion of privacy for acts performed in her dance studio and in a rented office. She’ll be tried later.

Strong’s trial has been moving in fits and starts.

On Thursday, members of the jury pool were sent home after the Maine Supreme Judicial Court stopped the closed-door selection process in response to a constitutional challenge by the Portland Press Herald. In a 6-1 ruling, the court ordered the remainder of the process in York County Superior Court to be opened.

No jurors have been seated out of the original pool of more than 140.

Mills had been conducting questioning of potential jurors behind closed doors because of potentially embarrassing questions focusing on views on sex, adultery, pornography and prostitution. But the high court said that wasn’t reason enough to close the proceedings.


Previous post:

Next post: